Americans Behaving Badly

Order BookReviews    Excerpts    Customer Service
Radok Press
Reuters Refuses to Call the Hijackers Terrorists

Copyright © 2003 by Radok CorporationHOME    e-mail  e-mail your comments    print page  print this pageBookmark
Reuters Refuses to Call the Hijackers Terrorists
Radok Internet Consulting


Radok News
Fax Machines
Terrorist News
Tabloid News

Phoenix City Guide
Best Political Book
Best Fax Machines
Internet Advertising


Reuters Refuses to Use
the Term, 'Terrorist'


If It Looks Like a Duck,
Walks Like a Duck,
and Quacks Like a Duck…


...It's a Duck



By Jake Easton

R A D O K  N E W S

Posted: May 16, 2003

ALTHOUGH THE TERM 'Terrorist' clearly defines the actions of the hijackers on September 11, some media organizations apparently don't want to offend the killers by calling them what they are. Reuters wire service, which bills itself as the world's largest news and television agency, is one of the media groups refusing to use the terms 'terrorist' or 'terrorism' when describing the terrorist attacks on America.

Steven Jukes, Reuters global head of news, explains Reuters reasoning in a memo; "We all know that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter and that Reuters upholds the principle that we do not use the word 'terrorist.' To be frank, it adds little to call the attack on the World Trade Center a terrorist attack."

National Review's Editor at Large, John O'Sullivan, strongly disagreed. "When Reuters decided not to call the perpetrators of the World Trade Center attack 'terrorists,' it took a step towards making people feel less guilty about aiding or sympathizing with such evil. It was a small step, but an unnecessary one. And it should be retracted. What word or phrase, after all, will now Reuters use to describe them? 'Mass murderers,' 'the people who attacked the World Trade Center,' 'militants,' 'guerrillas'?"

Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz said, "To Reuters, there are no terrorists… as of last week, suicide attacks that deliberately kill thousands of innocent civilians cannot even be described as acts of terror." Kurtz adds, "After the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and again after the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Reuters allowed the events to be described as acts of terror. But as of last week, even that terminology is banned."

Steven Jukes' comment came just weeks before two Reuters staffers were killed in November 2001 in another vicious attack in Afghanistan.

Reuters' employees Harry Burton, an Australian television cameraman, and Azizullah Haidari, a photographer born in Afghanistan, were among four journalists killed by six armed men identified as Taliban forces.

After killing the journalists, it was reported that one of the gunmen said: "You think the Taliban are finished? We are still in power, and we will have our revenge." There is still no word from Jukes as to what Reuters will be calling the perpetrators.  Radok News



Excerpts from the book:
Americans Behaving Badly
by Jake Easton


More articles like this...


  About The Book
Americans Behaving Badly,  by Jake Easton

Americans Behaving BadlyAmericans Behaving Badly exposes the outrageous behavior of liberal politicians, celebrities, the media, and those that exploited the September 11 attacks against America.

This site provides a preview of the hundreds of news stories outlined in Easton's 232 page, fully illustrated book.

Paperback - $12.95
ISBN: 0972242813

Hardcover - $22.95
ISBN: 0972242805

Order Here!

Amazon Rating: 
Barnes & Noble: 





Radok PressRadok Internet Consulting

Website Protection by Source WatchRadok Press is copyright © 1998-2003 by Radok Corporation. Contents and design has Website Protection by Source Watch.
This site was developed by Radok Internet Consulting, and features a proprietary Radok design (Patent Pending).
Worldwide Rights Reserved. About  |   Contact  |   Privacy  |   TermsRP|063851803